Saab Announces AI-Powered After-Action Review Platform for Military Training Defense technology company Saab is preparing to launch AR3, an innovative after-action review platform that harnesses artif...
The Ukraine conflict is fundamentally rewriting the playbook for American combat medicine, forcing a dramatic shift from counterinsurgency doctrine developed over two decades of Global War on Terror operations toward large-scale combat operations (LSCO) realities. With hundreds of thousands of casualties on both sides, the Russo-Ukrainian war offers stark lessons that military medical professionals cannot ignore. The most visible transformation stems from drone warfare proliferation. Unlike traditional artillery that creates fragmentation wounds affecting large areas, FPV drones and precision munitions function as targeted weapons hunting individual soldiers. This shift has dramatically altered casualty profiles: Russian forces report death-to-wounded ratios as high as 1:1.3 in certain sectors, compared to historical conflicts where wounded significantly outnumber fatalities. More critically, drone-dominated airspace has crippled traditional medevac operations. Helicopter losses—Russia has already lost at least 166 rotorcraft—force increasing reliance on ground-based casualty evacuation, extending evacuation times from minutes to hours. This convergence of deadlier wounds and delayed treatment creates a survival crisis.
WASHINGTON — As unmanned aerial threats proliferate across NATO’s Eastern frontier, the US Army is fundamentally reimagining how military organizations develop and deploy counter-drone capabilities. During Project Flytrap 4. The exercise represents far more than a traditional acquisition competition. According to Brigadier General Curtis King, chief of the 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command, the effort directly supports “strengthening NATO’s Eastern point deterrence line against drone threats, specifically against what we’ve called one-way attack drones.”