JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

Airbus A350 Costs 50% Less Than Boeing 787

Key Takeaways
  • The Airbus A350 cost $15 billion to develop, compared to $30-32 billion for the Boeing 787.
  • Development strategies differed, with Boeing outsourcing 70% of production.
  • Airbus retained greater control over design and integration.
  • The A350 has a slight advantage in range and payload.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The cost difference may indicate that Airbus's more controlled development strategy could be more effective in managing risk and costs, while Boeing's ambitious approach may have introduced unforeseen challenges, suggesting a balance between innovation and efficiency is crucial in aircraft development.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Development Strategies Compared In Widebody Aircraft Production

The Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 are often compared as direct rivals, but they differ in development costs, with the A350 costing roughly $15 billion to develop, compared to $30-32 billion for the 787. This gap reflects the different development strategies employed by the two manufacturers, with Boeing outsourcing a significant portion of production and Airbus retaining greater control. The A350 also has a slight advantage in range and payload, making it suitable for busier routes. This article was first reported by Unknown Source.

Source | Originally Published: August 24, 2026

Advertisement 728 × 90
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

Airbus A350 Costs 50% Less Than Boeing 787

Sponsored by: Jumpseat Solutions
Key Takeaways
  • The Airbus A350 cost $15 billion to develop, compared to $30-32 billion for the Boeing 787.
  • Development strategies differed, with Boeing outsourcing 70% of production.
  • Airbus retained greater control over design and integration.
  • The A350 has a slight advantage in range and payload.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The cost difference may indicate that Airbus's more controlled development strategy could be more effective in managing risk and costs, while Boeing's ambitious approach may have introduced unforeseen challenges, suggesting a balance between innovation and efficiency is crucial in aircraft development.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Development Strategies Compared In Widebody Aircraft Production

The Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 are often compared as direct rivals, but they differ in development costs, with the A350 costing roughly $15 billion to develop, compared to $30-32 billion for the 787. This gap reflects the different development strategies employed by the two manufacturers, with Boeing outsourcing a significant portion of production and Airbus retaining greater control. The A350 also has a slight advantage in range and payload, making it suitable for busier routes. This article was first reported by Unknown Source.

Source | Originally Published: August 24, 2026

Advertisement 300 × 250 Google AdSense