JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

Pentagon Struggles With Key Weapons Development Timelines

Key Takeaways
  • Pentagon struggles to meet weapons delivery timelines.
  • Average delivery time increased to over 12 years.
  • Several programs face delays and cost growth.
  • GAO recommends starting with mature technologies.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The Pentagon's struggles with development timelines may indicate challenges in fielding new capabilities quickly, which could impact the US military's competitive edge. The GAO's findings suggest that the use of rapid prototyping and fielding pathways may not be yielding the desired results, and that a focus on mature technologies could be necessary to improve program outcomes.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Delays And Cost Growth Plague Multiple Defense Programs

The Pentagon is continuing to struggle with meeting key weapons development timelines, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The report found that the average time frame to deliver a capability increased to over 12 years, and that several major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) are facing delays and cost growth. The GAO recommended that the Pentagon require programs to start with mature technologies, which the department agreed to. The report highlights challenges with programs such as the Air Force’s T-7 and VC-25B, as well as the Navy’s DDG 51 and ORCA XLUUV. This was first reported by Breaking Defense.

Source

Advertisement 728 × 90
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

Pentagon Struggles With Key Weapons Development Timelines

Sponsored by: Jumpseat Solutions
Key Takeaways
  • Pentagon struggles to meet weapons delivery timelines.
  • Average delivery time increased to over 12 years.
  • Several programs face delays and cost growth.
  • GAO recommends starting with mature technologies.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The Pentagon's struggles with development timelines may indicate challenges in fielding new capabilities quickly, which could impact the US military's competitive edge. The GAO's findings suggest that the use of rapid prototyping and fielding pathways may not be yielding the desired results, and that a focus on mature technologies could be necessary to improve program outcomes.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Delays And Cost Growth Plague Multiple Defense Programs

The Pentagon is continuing to struggle with meeting key weapons development timelines, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The report found that the average time frame to deliver a capability increased to over 12 years, and that several major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) are facing delays and cost growth. The GAO recommended that the Pentagon require programs to start with mature technologies, which the department agreed to. The report highlights challenges with programs such as the Air Force’s T-7 and VC-25B, as well as the Navy’s DDG 51 and ORCA XLUUV. This was first reported by Breaking Defense.

Source

Advertisement 300 × 250 Google AdSense