JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

AMPV 30 Heads to TiC 2.0

Key Takeaways
  • BAE Systems and Kongsberg send AMPV 30 prototypes to TiC 2.0.
  • AMPV 30 may offer alternative to XM30 Bradley replacement.
  • Vehicle has counter-unmanned aerial system technology.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The AMPV 30's participation in TiC 2.0 may indicate the Army's openness to rethinking its Bradley replacement requirements, which could suggest a shift in procurement priorities. This development may also signal a potential alternative to the XM30 program, which could impact the competitive landscape for armored vehicle manufacturers.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Alternative Bradley Replacement Option Enters Army Exercise

BAE Systems and Kongsberg are sending two AMPV 30 prototypes to the Army’s Transformation in Contact (TiC) 2.0 exercise, with hopes of showcasing an alternative to the troubled Bradley Fighting Vehicle replacement program. The AMPV 30, equipped with Kongsberg’s MCT-30 turret, is not a direct replacement for the XM30, but rather a different capability that could potentially fill a gap in the Army’s armored vehicle needs. The Army has stated that there is no current requirement for the AMPV 30, but the exercise may provide an opportunity for the service to reassess its priorities. This development was first reported by Breaking Defense.

Source

Advertisement 728 × 90
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS
JUMPSEAT
AEROSPACE NEWS

AMPV 30 Heads to TiC 2.0

Sponsored by: Jumpseat Solutions
Key Takeaways
  • BAE Systems and Kongsberg send AMPV 30 prototypes to TiC 2.0.
  • AMPV 30 may offer alternative to XM30 Bradley replacement.
  • Vehicle has counter-unmanned aerial system technology.
Sign in to view key takeaways Get full access to in-depth analysis and key takeaways.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Key Takeaways.
Upgrade
Strategic Implications

The AMPV 30's participation in TiC 2.0 may indicate the Army's openness to rethinking its Bradley replacement requirements, which could suggest a shift in procurement priorities. This development may also signal a potential alternative to the XM30 program, which could impact the competitive landscape for armored vehicle manufacturers.

Sign in to view strategic implications Get full access to strategic analysis and expert insights.
Sign In
Silver membership required Upgrade to Silver to access Strategic Implications.
Upgrade

What Happened

Alternative Bradley Replacement Option Enters Army Exercise

BAE Systems and Kongsberg are sending two AMPV 30 prototypes to the Army’s Transformation in Contact (TiC) 2.0 exercise, with hopes of showcasing an alternative to the troubled Bradley Fighting Vehicle replacement program. The AMPV 30, equipped with Kongsberg’s MCT-30 turret, is not a direct replacement for the XM30, but rather a different capability that could potentially fill a gap in the Army’s armored vehicle needs. The Army has stated that there is no current requirement for the AMPV 30, but the exercise may provide an opportunity for the service to reassess its priorities. This development was first reported by Breaking Defense.

Source

Advertisement 300 × 250 Google AdSense