Key Takeaways

  • Engine transitions compress technical, regulatory, and commercial risk into a short window.
  • Governance gaps drive cost overruns and delays.
  • CAMO consultancy adds value by governing the technical and compliance framework around the engine.

Strategic Implications

The focus on protecting asset value through disciplined engineering governance may indicate airlines’ and lessors’ growing concern about the risks associated with high-asset mobility. The deployment of CAMO consultancy models suggests a shift in defense priorities, as traditional reactive approaches to engine transitions are no longer sufficient.